Oh, come on, let the little buggers have their sexually provocative pictures. So they don't have the taste or consideration to get their titillation in private. Jeeze, we wouldn't have all these laws banning this and that behavior if people were just a little more considerate. For example, there would be no smoking laws if the smokers were considerate of nonsmokers and vice-versa. Why is it only sexually, racially, etc.-ly offensive material is verboten? I mean, I find anti-science and anti-intellectual people offensive. If I saw "Probability sucks" in large letters in somebody's background, I'd be irritated -- probably more irritated than if there was a picture from the infamous "bathing suit" issue of Sports Illustrated there. Why are people so hostile about sexual subjects? (Is it because it drives too much of their lives?) Silly me. I just don't understand. mp -- Frappez mes cheveux! mp rides the range and the domain......... juno@catt.ncsu.edu mpcampbe@eos.ncsu.edu CLAIMER: I speak for EVERYBODY! ha HA DEAL WITH IT. ****************** ******************** **************** "I like art that doesn't suck." --- Carey "Pi dot is just pi!" ---- (stupid) me "You mean we have to drive all the way from Denver to Colorado?" -- Amy