29 Jan 97
I have been balked all day by a terminal that disconnected every time I
typed '1'. Now that is fixed.
I have decided, barring anything actually interesting happening, not to
talk about my current life. It seems that noone really cares to hear if I
bought pasta sauce at the grocery store, or wrote out solution sets, or
walked three miles to find a yarn store only to discover the next day I
had missed it by a block.
No, it seems that people prefer my diatribes, and I can't blame them. If
I have an actual brush with celebrity or true strangeness (as opposed to
your run-of-the-mill just-being-human kind), I will be sure to mention it.
Other than that, we will just live in my mind.
That being said, let me pick up the latest bull session topics: ebonics
(another one: Is there a monster named Harry on Sesame Street? If there
is, please send me proof/documentation/whatever. I don't ever remember a
monster called Harry). I choose not to address the usual discussion of
ebonics or even the trivializing parodies of dialects. I just want to
recall my own experience with "bad English".
When I was in 9th grade or so, we were all sitting down to a family
dinner; as usual, Amy had a story she wanted to tell us about various kids
in her school. Amy used the phrases "like", "well", and "you know" very
liberally as punctuation (eeto, soo desu ne? de wa...). My dad thought
this was a bad habit. Luckily, he was sitting right next to her, so he
could do something about it. He held his hand next to her cheek, and
every time Amy uttered one of the forbidden words he'd tap her on the
face.
Some call this classical conditioning.
The results were interesting, but somewhat mixed. Amy tried not to use
the offending phrases; her speech slowed down _quite_ noticably. But
there was only so much she could do. Once she thought she got the hang of
it, she sped up her normal clip and out popped another "ya know". At
which point she became flustered. I don't think Dad ever let her get to
the end of the story.
There are many varieties of English dialects, some closer to "standard"
English than others. People forget that all the rules in the grammar
books and all the definitions in the dictionaries are based on common use
of structure and words sometime in the history of the English language.
Americans don't speak as the British do, and I think they have a right to
claim they have the proper pronunciation (after all, modern English was
developed there). Of course, the current British "Received Pronunciation"
was deliberately created during our colonial period so that their language
wouldn't sound so ugly compared to other European languages. It reminds
me when I deliberately started circling my i's and crossing my z's because
the supposed characteristics implied (in my younger days I was into
graphology and other silly methods of self-discovery).
So what is my point? It is only cultural consensus that determines which
dialect of a language is considered the priveleged one. In the South, at
least before this second invasion of Northern money and people, having a
Northern accent immediately set you in a pariah class. It doesn't matter
that your accent sounds society in Massachusetts or Long Island; if your
voice marked you as "damnyankee" you were to be treated as some strange
animal. In other parts of the country, the slower Southern speech was
marked as innate stupidity; in Charleston one might consider such an
accent as having thoughtful deliberation. One would savor each word
individually as if it were a bon-bon, as opposed to spitting them out like
watermelon seeds. But hey, I am prejudiced. Of course, because of my
yankee ma, my sisters and I can thoughtfully deliberate at break-neck
speeds.